Dada

            I chose this photograph from the Dada movement, which is an urinal upside down. Since the Dada is a revolutionary movement, I think the photographer wanted show that, rebelion. He wanted to create a new perspective of what was considered art, break the sterotype that art is perfect, bautiful, attractive, etc.

            In my opinion the artist wanted show the opposite of what the world was used to, an urinal is not something considered beautiful, but nasty (for obvious reasons), and it’s upside down, like telling “this is they way we are going to represent art, this is art for us, are is subjective, this is our perspective.”  

            Who would considered this photograph art? It’s hard to believe it is. But ironically it became a symbol, it became famous and acclaimed (maybe no in the time it was created, but later then it did).

            Now lets read this article about the photograph. It’s origen and history:

            Fountain is one of Duchamp’s most famous works and is widely seen as an icon of twentieth-century art. The original, which is lost, consisted of a standard urinal, usually presented on its back for exhibition purposes rather than upright, and was signed and dated ‘R. Mutt 1917’.

            Duchamp later recalled that the idea for Fountain arose from a discussion with the collector Walter Arensberg (1878–1954) and the artist Joseph Stella (1877–1946) in New York. He purchased a urinal from a sanitary ware supplier and submitted it – or arranged for it to be submitted – as an artwork by ‘R. Mutt’ to the newly established Society of Independent Artists that Duchamp himself had helped found and promote on the lines of the Parisian Salon des Indépendants (Duchamp had moved from Paris to New York in 1915). The society’s board of directors, who were bound by the Society’s constitution to accept all members’ submissions, took exception to Fountain, believing that a piece of sanitary ware – and one associated with bodily waste – could not be considered a work of art and furthermore was indecent (presumably, although this was not said, if displayed to women). Following a discussion and a vote, the directors present during the installation of the show at the Grand Central Palace (about ten of them according to a report in the New York Herald) narrowly decided on behalf of the board to exclude the submission from the Society’s inaugural exhibition that opened to the public on 10 April 1917. Arensberg and Duchamp resigned in protest against the board taking it upon itself to veto and effectively censor an artist’s work.

For the full article you can click on this link:

http://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/duchamp-fountain-t07573/text-summary